Monday, June 20, 2011
Graduation 2011
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
PD Day of PLAY - Take 2
Last school year (October 2009) we ran a High School Professional Development Day called the PD Day of PLAY, where PLAY was an acronym for Passionate Learning About You. It was a scaled down version of the IB-MYP Personal Project based on the readings of Dan Pink and Sir Ken Robinson along with John C. Maxwell and Todd Whitaker. Teachers had the day to explore an area of Singapore, investigate a problem they wanted to solve or create a project ... all on their own schedule for the day. Teachers wrote and recorded music, some just wrote, they learned software, some explored the far corners of Singapore, a couple kayaked, one learned a new art, one worked on her Mandarin and a few experimented with some new recipes. All in all the feedback was positive. So much so that I felt I need to share the success of the day at the IBO Conference in March 2010.
My Prezi for the IBO presentation in March 2010 and staff reflections from the first PD Day of PLAY:
But as this school year developed and I wanted to run another PD Day of PLAY, something just didn’t sit right with me, I was one of the kayakers, there were two of us. There were three aspiring chefs, but the rest of the staff chose to work in isolation. Don’t get me wrong, they did some amazing things. But as an educator in the 21st Century, I can hear everyone screaming “collaboration” from the top of the internet satellites. That along with my recent ADE 2011 experience, where sharing and learning together were consistent themes ... I felt I needed to address this.
So on May 17, 2011, the basic idea was the same, full day, do what you’re passionate about. But we ran through some exercises (thanks to Rebecca Stockley) that engaged the staff in finding out more about each other, exploring common ideas and forming groups. The reflection at the end of the day was different as well. The groups had five minutes to present their findings to the rest of the staff. Here’s what came out of the day:
1. A emotional day of volunteering at an old age home
2. Photography and camera work at Jurong Bird Park
3. Writing and recording an original score
4. Creating a movie of the people of Singapore
5. Learning Yoga and biking the area around the new campus
6. Individual challenges with photography around Singapore
7. Exploring Kent Ridges Park, Science Centre and the Asian Civilization Museum
8. Learning new software
9. Risk Analysis and Golf ECA inquiries
Staff reflections on PD Day of PLAY - Take 2 are in the comments below:
Thursday, May 5, 2011
MYP Personal Project Exhibition
Today was the big day for the grade 10 students to present their Personal Projects to the rest of the school and to the parents. The students had a choice of "displaying", "discussing" or "demonstrating" their projects and they have done a great job of all three!
This is a day I've come to love because I get to discuss the students passions with them. They speak eloquently and knowledgeably about a wide range of topics. Today, I learned about making a computer, Foot and Mouth disease in Korean farm animals, wakeboarding tricks, the battle of Normandy as seen through Google Sketch-up drawings. I spoke to a student who researched child soldiers and then wrote his own short story. I saw students dance, play their own musical creations using software, perform their own musical scores, one with a Chinese guzheng and another with harp, who incidently, also sang!
Thank you to Mr. Mark Patton for overseeing the entire process from start to finish as our Middle Years Programme Coordinator. He has again raised the bar for the current grades 9 for next year's exhibition. Thank you to all of the teacher supervisors who supported the students in completing their projects, edited their personal statements and monitored the displays. It has been the efforts of many that have made today a success.
But the biggest thanks goes to the students who have put in countless hours following their passions and creating the projects that we saw in today's exhibition.
Congratulations!
Monday, May 2, 2011
How Social Media is Changing University Admissions
Saturday, April 23, 2011
It takes a Whole Village to Raise a Child ... and Put on a Drama Production
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Howdya Like Dem Apples - ADE '11 Greatest Moments
- Warm-up, ice-breaker and group activities presented by Rebecca Stockley. More activities can be found at http://thiagi.com/
- Photo sharing and tips by Joseph Linaschke.
- Thinking different with Rob Ferrin, Hillary Daniels and Jabiz Raisdana. Creating a video for the Saigon Race contest that satisfied the least number of criteria ... and winning.
- Feeling like bumbling idiots, scouring the streets of HCMC with Sean Deetlefs, Steve Katz and John Wu looking for potential interviewees ... while Br. Dennis Magbanua, Dianna Pratt and Hillary were holding new born babies.
- Fantastic Food!
- Evening connection time.
- Meeting the sweetest little girl in the market. And the ensuing conversations about her story.
- Being introduced to the "3 Idiots" ... not literally ... the movie.
- Spotlight Sharing (the REAL TED talk) and Un-Conferences (thanks Rebecca and Mano)
- Accessibility session and the tricks and tips learned! Thanks Sarah!
- The stories of Chow Pei Sze and Chai Yee-wei.
- I had to add a 12th ... watching the amazing 59 other application videos and tortuously waiting through all four days to have mine shown second last.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
ADE - Day 2 and 3 - Out and About in HCMC
- Accessibility in the classroom for every learner
- Final Cut Pro
- Logic Studio
- Basic Aperture
- iOS Webapp development
Saturday, April 9, 2011
ADE Day 1 - The Brand of Me
Monday, March 7, 2011
Teaching Science and Humanities with Technology
First, Tanya Nizam's grade 9 Science class. Tanya has been using blogs to have students share hypotheses and data. They also used the blog to analyze data, charts and the MYP assessment criteria, giving the students the opportunity to comment on each other's posts. It was a great way for the students to be engaged in a virtual discussion that could be happening at any time. Then follow-up discussions in the classroom reinforce the concepts and understandings.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Sleepy Teens and 21st Century Possibilities
On Friday, February 18, we had the pleasure of listening to John Joseph (www.focuseducation.com.au) for the second time in as many years. John’s specialty is “Learning with the Brain in Mind”. He also treated our parents to an evening of “Parenting with the Brain in Mind” on Thursday, February 17. He talked about the brain being a changeable system rather than a fixed one, where students can continue to grow their brain and it is not limited in what it can accomplish. He spoke about teachers being second only to the students in their “sphere of influence” in attempting to close the achievement gap (peers are third and family is fourth). And feedback for learning being one of the most important aspects teachers can provide based on John Hattie’s work from October 2003, Teachers make a difference - What is the Research Evidence.
photo © 2007 Yuvi Panda | more info (via: Wylio)
But the main message that came out of his presentation was related to the hours of sleep that current teenagers are getting and whether it is enough. Much research stipulated that teenagers should be getting 9 hours sleep a night. 9 hours! I’m not sure many of our students today adhere to that. He also went on to say that melatonin “kicks in” for teenagers around 2:00 pm, making them tired and ready for a nap. If you have ever taught Math last period of the day, you have first-hand experience with this phenomenon. So given all of this information about teenagers, we obviously need to educate our students about the importance of sleep and sleep patterns. So my questions to think about:
· What is the best educational model for teenagers today?
· How flexible can/should the schedule be?
· How much responsibility can we put on the students?
Thoughts?
Sunday, January 23, 2011
To Learn, Take a Test ... Really?!?!
- The students who did better on the test, already wrote a test on the same content, thus received an extra practice round. this also leads to my next point.
- These students are university undergraduates, presumably trained to do well in testing or exam writing (since that is generally the main assessment tool used to determine grades for university admissions). I don't think I'm going too far out an a limb here to say that many high school classrooms train students to write exams, by practicing exams. In this experiment, the students are asked to "study" using a method (concept mapping) that is foreign to them.
- Tests generally, evaluate one's ability to regurgitate information back. The questioning needs to be of a higher order to assess for understanding. Difficult to do on a test. And isn't understanding more important?